The mindset of the Meiteis, dominant community of Manipur, is not changing at all. In fact, they have become aggressive to continue their dominance over the tribes. If the current balanced approach propagated by Dr Raj Singh in one of his articles “Policy proposal for ending ethnic conflicts in Manipur A balanced approach to peace, autonomy and land reforms” published in The Sangai Express, Imphal, on 10th March 2025, is any indication of their state of mind, they will not concede any rights to the tribes and keep them as second class citizens.
The Meitei intelligentsia seems to have forgotten that Nagas have always fought for a united Naga state embracing all Naga tribes living in the Patkai ranges and the hills surrounding it. Historical circumstances had presented a situation to the first batch of enlightened Nagas, who faced brutal onslaught from the Indian army and thought it advantageous to accept a political settlement i.e. the 16th Point Agreement. This agreement created the first state for the Nagas living in the Naga Hills and Tuensang in Assam called Nagaland while other Nagas living outside the state of Nagaland were given hope of integration under Point 13 of the agreement. The Nagas have been aspiring for more than a century to become one united Naga people based on the fact of its unique history of never being part of any Indian ruler or kingdom, but under the British colonial power from whom Nagas declared its independence a day before India attained its independence.
The awakening of Kuki tribes has been a more recent phenomenon. They asked for a district in Manipur and was given Kangpokpi much against strong protest by the Nagas. They have been cozying up with the Meiteis and had their zenith of partnership under Mr O Ibobi Singh, former congress chief minister who had adopted a strong anti-Naga approach during his 15 years in power. It was Mr N Biren Singh, who adopted a friendlier approach with the Nagas and this shift could have made an impact on Kuki-Zomi-Hmar tribes relationship with the Meiteis. Now the political disturbances in Myanmar seem to have fired the imagination of Kuki-Zomi-Hmar tribes who seem to dream of a larger political entity of brotherhood under the Chin nomenclature. They appear to think after the ethnic clashes that their relationship with the Meiteis has gone beyond a point of no return and are now demanding a separate administration. However, this may not be the only reason why they are steadfast on their stance to separate from Manipur. Kuki-Zomi-Hmar tribes have lost total confidence with the Meiteis, who is the dominant community, about any change of heart to mete out fair play and justice towards them. Take for instance the strident demand for ST status by the Meitei community with intent to encroach on tribal lands in the “Hill Areas” and given their clout in the government and resources, Kuki-Zomi-Hmar tribes seem to fear that they will lose their lands in the hill areas adjoining the Imphal valley if they continue to be part of Manipur. They may be right about that, as Mr N Biren Singh’s government had toyed with the idea of redrawing district boundaries to carve out areas from the hill districts into the valley district on the ground of administrative convenience. Dr Raj Singh has targeted tribal lands in the “Hill Areas” by suggesting amendment of Article 371-C, extension of MLR&LR Act 1960 with amendments and demand for ST status for Meiteis, all of which are directed to benefit only the Meiteis. In return for the tribes he is offering mere amendments of the archaic Manipur District Council (Hill Areas) Act, 1971 for the tribes as a remedy to redress all their grievances. This line of thinking seems to push every logical thinking tribal person to conclude that there is no scope for the tribes to visualise a situation of living together with the Meiteis. The rigid mindset of Meiteis of not granting any quarters for the tribes may soon convince the tribes of the futility of thinking that there is a future to live together with the Meiteis.
While the Nagas of Nagaland continue to flourish in their own state without being dominated by any community, the Naga tribes of Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh suffer from domination from the dominant community and are exploited, suppressed and subjugated. The Nagas outside Nagaland have been living in misery and poverty and deserve better after nearly a century of struggle. A settlement under the Framework Agreement would be the best outcome for the Nagas, but no one knows when or if it will ever materialise. If the Meitei community want to save Manipur from balkanisation they should show magnanimity by conceding to the demands of the tribes for fair play and justice and concede to a Bodoland type of territorial councils for the tribes, leave land matters to the magnanimity of the tribes to work out a land use policy under the land laws of the hill areas which would be inclusive for all citizens of the state and abandon all thoughts of getting what they want by using their political and monetary clout. The trust deficit has to be bridged and it is for the Meiteis to start the ball rolling for reconciliation. After all, they are supposed to be the big brother.
*Courtesy: https://x.com/shimray2011
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments not related to the topic will be removed immediately.